Laurens Provided. S. & L. Assn. v. Income tax Percentage, 365 U.S. 517 (1961)
Area 13 of the Federal Home loan Lender Work, and this exempts federal home loan financial institutions and their “advances” away from state income tax, pubs your state from requiring a national deals and financing association to pay documentary stamp taxation with the promissory notes performed by the relationship in favor of a federal financial lender to cover funds in the bank toward association. Pp. 365 U. S. 518 -524.
Laurens Fed. S. & L. Assn. v. Taxation Percentage, 365 U.S. 517 (1961)
(a) The immune system provided so you can “advances” out-of a national financial financial by the 13 of the Federal Home loan Financial Operate are wide enough to help you club state stamp fees into like that loan. Pittman v. Domestic Owners’ Financing Corp., 308 U. S. 21 . Pp. 365 You. S. 519 -522.
(b) Point 5(h) of the property Owners’ Mortgage Work from 1933, which provides one to no State shall tax a federal discounts and you may loan relationship during the a higher rate than simply they taxes most other comparable local mutual or cooperative thrift and you will a mortgage establishments, didn’t explicitly otherwise impliedly repeal 13 of one’s Government Financial Lender Work, hence exempts “advances” away from federal financial finance companies from state income tax. Pp. 365 You. S. 522 -524.
U.S. Supreme Courtroom
Section 13 of your Federal Home loan Lender Operate, which exempts federal financial banks in addition to their “advances” out of state taxation, bars a state away from requiring a national coupons and you can mortgage connection to spend documentary stamp fees on the promissory notes conducted from the organization and only a federal financial financial to pay for loans about financial towards the organization. Pp. 365 U. S. 518 -524.
Laurens Fed. S. & L. Assn. v. Tax Commission, 365 You.S. 517 (1961)
(a) New immunity system supplied so you’re able to “advances” regarding a national financial lender from the thirteen of your own Federal Home loan Bank Work is wide adequate to bar county stamp taxes for the like financing. Pittman v. Household Owners’ Mortgage Corp., 308 You. S. 21 . Pp. 365 You. S. 519 -522.
(b) Area 5(h) of the property Owners’ Mortgage Work out of 1933, which provides you to definitely no State will income tax a federal coupons and you will financing organization from the a higher rate than simply they taxes most other similar local mutual or collaborative thrift and you may a mortgage establishments, failed to expressly or impliedly repeal 13 of your Government Mortgage Bank Work, which exempts “advances” out of federal financial banks off state tax. Pp. 365 You. S. 522 -524.
Petitioner is actually a national Deals and you may Financing Association structured under the Family Owners’ Financing Act out-of 1933 [Footnote step 1] and you may working in Laurens, Sc. It is reasonably a part, having credit benefits, of one’s Federal Mortgage Bank of Greensboro, North carolina, that was built under the Government Mortgage Bank Work from 1932. [Footnote dos] For the purpose of making mortgage money in the city it serves, petitioner Federal Discounts and you will Loan Organization provides, as the August 12, 1953, secure “improves,” or funds, throughout the Federal Home loan Lender away from Greensboro totalling $5,675,000, wherein petitioner done composed promissory cards toward Bank while the necessary for the newest 1932 Operate. The official reviewed up against petitioner loan places Peterman area documentary stamp fees during these notes of $2,270 less than your state statute towering an excellent stamp tax with the promissory notes on rate of four dollars for each $100. [Footnote step three] Petitioner repaid these taxation significantly less than protest after which produced the present step from the state courtroom to own reimburse of payment, [Footnote 4] claiming the imposition of your own fees constituted an unlawful attempt from the Condition to help you income tax the “advances” of your Federal Mortgage Lender out-of Greensboro when you look at the solution out of the brand new provision of 1932